Home » Posts tagged "government"

Posts Tagged ‘government’:


Will The Chinese Fund Our Medical Insurance Too

One thing is for certain, elected officials are not holding back their thoughts of the health care reform law that was recently enacted. The Republican Party, wanting to make good on their campaign pledges, have already repealed this law in the House. However, Democrats are trying to safeguard this law because it is promoted as their greatest achievement throughout the leadership of the Obama administration. And with taxpayers which are equally divided on this matter, the health care reform law will be in the news for quite a while.

What is missing in the news are the genuine solutions to the medical care challenges the United States is confronting. The price of medical care, that is the main worry of many, hasn't been discussed by either political party. For a long time the price of medical treatment has greatly exceeded the general inflation rate and the pay increases which many employees receive annually. Until the cost of medical care is contained, more companies are going to be compelled to drop the medical insurance coverage they provide to their employees.

While the health care reform law has its advantages, many believe this law is only transferring the expense of paying for medical insurance coverage from companies to citizens. And people who believe this will occur unquestionably have genuine concerns. Already many businesses have eliminated their pension plans and some companies have already confirmed it will be cheaper for them to discontinue providing medical insurance to their workers after the health care reform law is fully active.

The majority of people don't want the government involved in their health care. Who can blame these individuals? It seems that most things the government tinkers with usually costs considerably more then proposed and less beneficial then that which was proposed to the voting public. Nevertheless, neither political party has dedicated to getting folks working again. All that spending reductions and economic stimulus packages are going to do is postpone the continual decline in the USA quality of life.

Politicians repeatedly speak about being competitive in the global economy. Regretfully, our country can not even remain competitive in our own states. We are competing with China, a nation in which many folks make less than seventy cents for every hour they work. At one tenth of our minimum wage, this isn't being competitive but is an all out slaughter of the American labor force. And until political leaders opt to take care of these trade issues, the American way of life will continue its decline until our incomes are more competitive with those we trade with. This ought to be a frightening thought to most people, but taxpayers are mostly focused on the national health care debate.

Earlier generations of American citizens struggled for our freedoms and independence. But we are now at a crossroad, in which our political leaders have entered into tremendously harmful trade agreements with China and other nations. As voters we must ask ourselves what precisely has motivated our leaders to sell out the American workforce to a Communist nation. When some politicians with a backbone arise, maybe then our trade agreements can be improved to better exhibit our needs to consume and earn a living. Restoring this balance is crucial so that American families have the means buy their own medical insurance plans and to keep government out of our private lives.

 



What Is Birthright Citizenship?

Pregnant illegal alien

photo credit: Life Magazine

I have a summertime pop-quiz for you. How about this one, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" Who said, "Give me liberty, or give me death!" Right. Patrick Henry. Ronald Reagan made that challenge. Finally, who said, "Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth. It's a matter of faith." That statement was made by Barack Obama.

When it comes to citizenship and who can be an American citizen, is it a matter of faith, as the President stated? Or is it more accurate to say that American citizenship is a matter of settled law? The U.S. Constitution states in Article 1, Section 8, that Congress (the lawmaking branch of the three branches of government) has the authority to make laws governing citizenship. At the time the Constitution was written, the Framers were just coming to terms with all the details of forming a new nation. They all had been Englishmen before the Revolution, but now, they were Americans. The Founders had to settle the question of whom else could become an American.

Some say that any child born in the United States, even if his parents are in the U.S. illegally, should be entitled to birthright citizenship. Although Congress passes law in the three branches of government, the judicial branch has effectively made new law by establishing a precedent for continued birthright citizenship. Since we see so many expectant moms crossing the border just in time to give birth, it is clear that American citizenship is an attractive benefit to illegal immigrants. These newborns are given automatic citizenship, and serve as an "anchor" for the family's future.

The Civil War was fought, in part, over the great question of slavery. Slaves were not considered fully human by many of their captors, let alone American citizens. After the slaves' emancipation, there were some who would not recognize their citizenship, nor the citizenship of their offspring. This was an argument that had to be settled. The question of who was entitled to American citizenship was addressed in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was passed to clarify the status of freed slaves. It begins, "All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States..." The clause "not subject to any foreign power" is salient when examining the issue of citizenship. The Amendment's language clearly points to allegiance to America as the key to citizenship by right of birth.

The Fourteenth Amendment begins, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." The portion of that statement that is critical, is the clause "...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof..." It is clear that only those who are subject to the jurisdiction of the United States of American are to be considered citizens.

Those who argue against birthright citizenship say that the Fourteenth Amendment requires a child's parent to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States in order for the newborn to attain American citizenship. Since minor children remain subject to their parents, and if the parents are foreign nationals, the child cannot be considered an American by birth. The Fourteenth Amendment jurisdiction clause negates birthright citizenship.

Constitutional language lays out the path to American citizenship, so how was a judicial precedent set in favor of birthright citizenship? The Supreme Court, in 1973, heard a New York case, Sugarman vs. Dougall. The state of New York terminated four legal resident aliens from federal jobs because they lacked U.S. citizenship. The workers filed suit against the state, and the Supreme Court (last on the list of the three branches of government) ruled that American citizenship could not be a determining factor in hiring for government jobs.

In 1982, the Supreme Court also threw out a Texas statute that denied children of undocumented aliens from attending public schools. The Court ruled that public education was so important to society, that even if a child's parents had come to the country illegally, the child was entitled to free education. Now, any child born on American soil is given citizenship as a right of birth.

Birthright citizenship and "anchor babies" are a hot topic in today's news. Liberals and Conservatives can disagree about birthright citizenship, but the Constitution is clear about who is a citizen. Only those born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens. Until the Congress passes a law to the contrary, any rulings by the Supreme Court, or any other court, are in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Lynn Schott shows students and families how easy it is to finish U.S. Government and Economics in Half the Time, and Without the Tears. She invites you to an informative FREE webinar to learn her secret to accelerated homeschool scheduling. Act now, this webinar will fill up fast! Reserve your seat now and learn more about inexpensive high school diploma courses online.



Checks And Balances – The Branches Of Government

Constitution of the United StatesSince the 2008 Presidential election, Congress and the White House have made many policy changes, and have passed sweeping new laws. Does the government have the right to be involved in health care, car companies, or banks? Have our elected officials overstepped the powers of limited government in the Constitution?

Any discussion of the limited power of government must begin with a list of the 3 branches of government. Then we can define limited government in light of delegated powers of the Constitution.

The three (U.S.A) usa branches of government are: Legislative, Executive and Judicial. Article 1 of the Constitution refers to the Legislative branch known as Congress, which is made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each state gets to elect two Senators, no matter the population of the state. Each Senator serves for 6 years before standing for re-election. Members of the House of Representatives are chosen by voters in their state Congressional districts. A state's Congressional districts are based on the Census population. Congressmen serve for 2 year terms before standing for re-election.

The Legislative branch is mentioned first in the Constitution, because the Founders saw it as the most important and powerful branch. The primary job of Legislators is to make law. The Constitution gives legislators the power to pass tax law, laws governing citizenship, the power to impeach, and the authority to declare war. Article 1 of the Constitution shows us examples of limited government.

Tax laws must be introduced in the House, because the Founding Fathers wanted Congressmen to think very carefully before raising taxes on the people. They wanted to make sure that Congress felt the pressure of being voted out of office. The Founders instituted limited power of government when they barred Senators from proposing tax increases. Judges and the President also cannot propose tax bills.

The Framers gave us a safeguard against a poorly-behaving  president. A sitting President can be removed by a process known as impeachment. The House must bring charges of impeachment, but the Senate must conduct the trial, and vote to convict and remove him. If the House lodges unnecessary impeachment charges, they will likely be punished at the next election. As the more deliberative body, the Senate conducts the trial. Being elected every six years insulates the Senators from the "passions of the people." These different roles in the impeachment process are a definition of limited government power.

The President and his cabinet make up the Executive Branch. The Executive branch is tasked with carrying out, or executing, laws passed by Legislators. Since we are a republic, not a democracy, our President is actually elected by the Electoral College, and not by popular vote. The purpose of the Electoral College is to prevent "intrigue and cabal" when choosing the Executive. Voters vote for electors, and the electors vote for the President. Power is separated, and there is a check within the three branches of government.

The Judicial Branch is the last on the list of 3 branches of government. It is mentioned last in the usa branches of government, as it was intended to be the least powerful. Thomas Jefferson warned that creating a Supreme Court would lead to a loss of power in the other two branches of government. Jefferson's warnings are coming true, as we often see Federal and state law struck down by the Supreme Court. Many believe that these actions violate the doctrine of limited government in the Constitution.

The President appoints Supreme Court justices to lifetime terms. Senators must confirm the appointees through a hearing process. The only way to unseat a justice is to impeach them under our definition of limited government. This almost never happens. On the other hand, if it were too simple to impeach a justice, the justices may spend more time worrying about making popular decisions than making sound legal rulings.

Answering the question about the government's proper role in our lives requires an understanding of the usa branches of government. The Framers instituted a structure of limited government in the Constitution because they feared the tyranny of old Europe would sprout up in the New World. Each of the branches of the us government as some power that checks a power held by the other two. Our liberties are protected by these checks and balances. Americans for limited government want their Constitutional liberties preserved.



© Constitution Party
Developed by Amore | Your Privacy